Grizzly census brings good news, despite being called “pork barreling”

800px-Grizzly_Bear_Yellowstone

Remember last year, during the presidential debates, when John McCain was speaking out against pork barreling?  As an example, he liked to bring up a government-funded study of grizzly bear DNA:  “I don’t know if that was a criminal issue or a paternal issue, but it was $3 million of our taxpayers’ money.”  That always got him some laughs, and it seemed like a reasonable point at the time.

As it turned out, that study (headed by U.S. Geological Survey biologist Kate Kendall) produced the first reliable census of the largest grizzly population in the lower forty-eight states.  And the results are great news for conservationists.

According to the National Wildlife article, “The grizzly population in northwestern Montana now stands at 765—two and a half times the previous government estimates.”  The numbers were obtained by setting up 2,500 “traps.”  Barrels of rotting fish attracted the bears and strands of barbed wire picked up fur samples when they walked by.  This enabled the biologists to get an accurate census without disturbing the grizzlies.

“The results show that we can turn species toward recovery when we put money, attention and habitat protections in place,” says John Kostyack, NWF executive director of wildlife conservation and global warming.  ”It’s an endangered species success story.”

I can’t help but wonder how much $3 million could have accomplished in actual conservation, but at least we’re seeing some evidence that protection efforts are working.

Since John McCain has a relatively good record on conservation (He’s one of the few Republicans that opposes ANWR drilling.), I won’t attack him for making fun of the study.  The point is that funding for science can often accomplish something worthwhile.

Bees: Their importance, their problems, and how you can help

Think about the animals that we try to protect.  Polar bears, seals, whales, elephants, and wolves are some of the creatures that conservation groups promote.  They are all integral members of the ecosystem, and their lives are intrinsically important.  And we can’t help but appreciate their aesthetic value.

But is there a lower-profile, less charismatic creature that is equally important?

Every third bite of food that you eat is made possible by bees.  In fact, Einstein predicted that, if bees went extinct,bee(3).jpghumans would follow suit four years later.  It would be hard to name many flora or fauna that are not connected to bees at some point in the food web.

Considering this, it would be reasonable to argue that, on an ecological scale, bees are one of the most important of all the animals we protect — including Homo sapiens.

And bees are in trouble.

Part of the problem is industrial agriculture, which is harmful to native bees.  Chemical herbicides kill the plants that bees rely on for nectar and pollen when crop plants are not in bloom.  In addition, the consolidation of small farms into massive spreads means plowing under nesting areas.  Bees are not magical fairies that appear seasonally when needed; they must also survive on their own throughout the entire year.

The irony here is that agribusiness is trying to increase production by eliminating “pests.”  But in the process, it is eliminating natural pollinators, thereby severely damaging production.

What is the solution?  Hives of honeybees (which are not native to North America) must be placed in fields so that the crops will produce enough to be commercially viable.  So, honeybees are now migrant workers.

At the same time, beekeeping as a profession has declined, due to competition from cheap imported honey, so the remaining bees must work harder.  They are artificially roused from dormancy and trucked across the country.

The stress of transportation, along with fungi, malnutrition, and overuse of pesticides and antibiotics, is a possible cause of colony collapse disorder (CCD).  CCD is a phenomenon in which entire hives of bees simply disappear, and its cause is not yet known.

While Big Ag is causing trouble for bees, individuals also have an impact. In our efforts to turn a wilderness into a suburban paradise, we inadvertently kill the pollinators that make our very existence possible.

Here are some easy ways to make your yard bee-friendly:

  • Avoid using pesticides, and when you must use them, spray at night, when bees are less active.
  • Tolerate “weeds” such as dandelions and clover.
  • Choose bee-friendly plants.
  • Think before cutting dead wood; it can provide homes for bees.

Climate change also effects bees;  if there is not enough rain, flowers that bees depend on will not bloom.  Therefore, reducing your carbon footprint is another way to indirectly help bees.

Out of control wildlife trade could cause next swine flu pandemic

From TreeHugger:

A startling new report has revealed that four out of five wild animals imported into the US aren’t accurately listed—a hugely discouraging number, considering that between 2000 and 2006, 1.5 billion live animals were imported into the US. The wildlife trade is so poorly regulated that it has some scientists worried that it may lead to more invasive species, damaged ecosystems, and worse: diseases that could spread to livestock and humans. Could the badly regulated US wildlife trade lead to another international epidemic?

Okay, so it wouldn’t be swine flu, per se. But an epidemic could again stem from contact with animals carrying foreign diseases.

Terra Daily reports:

“The threat to public health is real. The majority of emerging diseases come from wildlife,” said Katherine Smith, who is also a senior consultant at Wildlife Trust. “Most of these imported animals originate in Southeast Asia – a region shown to be a hotspot for these emerging diseases.”

Astonishingly, 200 million animals are imported to the U.S. every year, and the majority of those imports are not properly regulated:

The team also found that more than 86 percent of the shipments were not classified to the level of species, despite federal guidelines that mandate species-level labeling. The lack of accurate reporting makes it impossible to fully assess the diversity of animals imported or calculate the risk of nonnative species or the diseases they may carry, the team wrote.

Of course, there’s no way of knowing whether this situation will result in the next flu epidemic, but it certainly increases the chances of such a problem.  If nothing else, the H1N1 panic raised awareness of the issues that we tend to ignore.

Congress is beginning to debate the Nonnative Wildlife Invasion Prevention Act, a which would tighten up the slack regulations.