Mountaintop Removal: Not Just an Environmental Issue

 

Image Copyright David Rickless. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

Cross-posted from the RYSE Blog.

I spent the last week of October in the Great Smoky Mountains of Tennessee, hiking, photographing the rivers and foliage, and taking in the stunning landscapes. While the trip made my RYSE post a bit late, it also deepened my understanding of the value of pristine mountains, specifically the Appalachias.

Because of their National Park status, the Smoky Mountains are safe from coal mining. However, as my readers know, hundreds of mountains in Tennessee, West Viriginia, Virginia, and Kentucky have been literally blown up by mining companies in search of coal. If you study mountaintop removal mining objectively, the environmental damage alone is hard to brush aside. But Appalachian mining is different from some “environmental issues” in an important way; it has a clear human element.

Dry scientific facts add credibility, and they will convince some people to support a movement. But they are more powerful when accompanied by a story that strikes a genuine emotional chord. History’s most well known social movements were not solely driven by cold logic or emotional appeals; they were charged by an element of humanity that was impossible to ignore.

That human element lives on in the voices of Appalachia’s residents. It is our job to highlight it.

As I walked along a ridge, with forested mountains rising all around, I felt the human element of mountaintop mining more clearly than I had before. The peaks of the Smokies are protected, but they are not so different from the hills that are fated to have their heads blown off by explosives.

After just a few days in the mountains, I feel a sort of connection to them. I know I’m not alone—the Smokies make up America’s most visited National Park. If I lived among those mountains, if my family had lived there for generations and had helped sew the rich quilt of Appalachian culture, the connection would be even more powerful.

And if someone were clearing the forests, burying the steams, and poisoning the communities that exist in these mountains, I would fight it with every nonviolent means at my disposal. Because it wouldn’t just be “the environment;” it would be home.

If you think this sounds sentimental, then you’re right. But many people across Appalachia are echoing these sentiments. You can hear them from people like Maria Gunnoe, James Hansen, and others who are part of the movement to end mountaintop removal.

Yes, this movement is about the environment. It’s also about human rights and equality. And, at its heart, it’s about human feelings. When communities are disrupted and drinking water is poisoned, when a person can be barred from visiting the graves of her ancestors, that is not just an environmental issue. It is a human issue.

I don’t believe that our world has grown so cold than human feelings no longer matter. Nevertheless, it is up to us to make them matter, to turn raw emotion into an organized force for change.

If you’ve ever wanted to be part of something big, now is a perfect time. You can begin by sharing your thoughts. How can we grow the movement and bring the voices from the frontlines to a larger audience? Questions like these are essential, and you can be part of the answer.

 

 

Appalachians speak out on mountaintop mining

It’s not hard to find opinions on Appalachian mountaintop mining (or mountaintop removal, as opponents call it), but many of the campaigns, for or against, are headed by people who don’t experience the effects of mining firsthand.  If you’re debating whether to dig for coal in the mountains, why not ask the folks who live there?

The RAN recently did just that.  In their blog, The Understory, they interviewed several residents of Appalachia who are speaking out against mountaintop mining.  The stories are moving, and definitely worth reading.

We spent this morning with Maria Gunnoe from Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, this year’s Goldman Prize winner…Maria’s life has been threatened frequently, from bomb threats to attempts to run her off the road. Abuse is a constant part of her life; just yesterday someone almost hit her car as she drove with her daughter and son…

Maria is an animal person and lives with rescued cats and dogs and once fostered an injured deer. Around 2000 she noticed that frogs, once ubiquitous in the fields in front of her home, had started disappearing. The field used to be so loud with croaking that you couldn’t hold a conversation, but not anymore. She soon found out that the stream running by her home carried polluted run-off from a blast site.

She spoke about how several family cemeteries are currently being destroyed by mountaintop removal. Her group went in and marked off the required 100 foot buffer zone around three cemeteries, and the coal company moved the markers. The cemeteries are in the company’s permit zone, so people who want to visit gravesites…must make arrangements with the coal company…

As vulnerable as the cemeteries are, they’re about all that’s left of Lindytown. Over the past year, the town has been systematically de-populated and now there are just a few occupied homes remaining. Many of the homes that are left have been vandalized and looted…

Today, we arrived in Lindytown in time to meet Laura Webb, as her friends packed up her house and got her ready to move two hours away. Laura doesn’t want to move, and she’s furious at what the coal companies are doing to her community. She faced threats and intimidation before she agreed to sell her land. And even after signing a contract, her horse was killed and a truck knocked out her phone lines.

Laura is a plant person, and she’s nurtured many rare and endemic plants on her land. Some are underground now, so she can’t relocate them. I also saw her well-tended garden with the ripening tomatoes that will likely never be eaten.

When the mountains are blown up, they’re “reclaimed” by being sprayed with hydroseed – a mix of grass seed, newspaper and green dye). It’s not native grass and it has no nutritional value for wildlife. Most of the plants they use on reclaimed lands are invasive. The reclaimed land tends to shift and ends up in streams, so that invasive plants now line the streams.

The article goes on to describe the health effects of coal mining: The community is exposed to the same toxins that miners wear masks to protect themselves from.  You can check The Understory for the other interviews with Appalachian MTR opponents.

I know that personal stories aren’t as reliable as scientific studies.  Not all Appalachian residents experience such devastating impacts from mining; some may even support it.  But if mountaintop coal mining damages even a few communities and disrupts even a few lives, isn’t that a problem?

Tennessee kicks out coal, welcomes tourists instead

In case you haven’t heard, Coal-Mac, a subsidiary of St. Louis-based Arch Coal, has been encouraging its employees to boycott Tennessee, because the state is unfriendly to mountaintop removal.

From the NRDC Switchboard:

In a letter to local Chambers of Commerce, the company warns: “[I]f you want our industry’s business, we suggest you let your representatives know that the industry they are trying to destroy is a major source of your tourism money.”

The letter also notes that two other out-of-state Arch subsidiarues have cancelled their annual company picnics to Dollywood this year.  Apparently, a pro-MTR group called Citizens for Coal is joining in by asking all of its members to also boycott Tennessee travel.

Yeah, nothing screams “revenge” like canceling picnics.  Somehow, I don’t think blowing up the mountains that tourists come to see would help Tennessee’s tourist industry, and apparently state lawmakers feel the same way.  Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN) is a proud co-sponsor of the bipartisan Appalachia Restoration Act (S. 696), which would effectively ban MTR.

Just to put things in perspective, here are some facts gathered by the NRDC:

  • There are fewer than 6,000 miners in Tennessee whereas the tourism industry employs more than 177,000
  • Tennessee’s tourism contributes roughly $14 billion to the state’s economy every year
  • Kentucky spends an estimated $115 million more public money to support and subsidize the coal industry than it receives in state revenues from the industry
  • The coal industry actually ends up costing the Appalachian region roughly $42 billion (in terms of the value of premature deaths attributable to the mining industry across the coalfields)

    Economics aside, I enthusiastically applaud Tennessee for standing up to King Coal.  I have visited the Smoky Mountains, and this is what they look like:

    3735514119_262d9bcb91

    3736303098_709887688e

    This is what mountaintop removal looks like:

    MTR Sept 17-21.JPG

    Need I say more?

    Coal is to solar as stone club is to bronze shield.

    As alternative energy sources gain popularity among politicians and their consumers, the Big Coal industry is spending millions in a desperate attempt to improve its image.  One of the most common greenwashing terms is “clean coal.”  This oxymoron is usually used to describe efforts to make coal plants environmentally friendly by capturing the greenhouse gases that they emit.  I believe Melange puts it quite well:

    A coal plant that captures some (or even all) of its CO2 emissions is NOT “environment-friendly” by any stretch of the imagination. “Slightly-less-deadly,” certainly.

    That post goes on to mention major problems with coal, such as mountaintop removal.  If you have ever entertained the thought that coal could be clean, I recommend that you look into that practice.

    The truth is, there is no such thing as clean coal. As This is Reality points out, there is currently not a single power plant that captures its GHG pollution.  While Big Coal insists that it is commited to carbon capture and sequestration, its supporters have actually been fighting energy progress for years.

    Coal is still the dirtiest energy source, and if we really want to move forward, we need to focus on the future.  At the end of the Stone Age, wasn’t it lucky that people didn’t just try to make their rocks harder?  Coal is the stone club of the 21st century.  Let’s see if we can move on to bronze shields.

    I really don’t like Big Coal.

    Here’s a post from Rainforest Action Network’s awesome blog, The Understory.  Although I can’t say I got arrested in April, I totally support the sentiment.

    This is a post written by Scott Parkin, RAN’s Coal Finance Senior Organizer. Scott was released last night after being arrested in Charlotte, NC while protesting at Duke Energy’s headquarters.

    I really don’t like Big Coal.

    I don’t like it when they blow the tops of mountains. I don’t like it when their power plants pollute local air and water. I don’t like when coal ash waste poisons whole communities. I especially don’t like how Big Coal is responsible for 42% of global carbon emissions causing catastrophic climate change.

    So today, I joined hundreds of friends and got ARRESTED in a peaceful civil disobedience at Duke Energy’s headquarters in Charlotte, North Carolina.

    Duke Energy is building a new coal fired power plant in Ciffside, NC. If built, the plant is predicted to emit six million tons of carbon dioxide every year for the next 50 years.

    All over the country, people like me and you are taking action against big coal. We are all stepping it up and taking more risks to stop Big Coal’s destructive behavior. Protests as far away as California, or as nearby as the mountains of West Virginia, Tennessee, and Kentucky. The movement to quit coal and stop global warming is sweeping the nation.

    It’s time to step this fight against Big Coal and climate change up.